Thematic coverage and readability of online patient information on cochlear implant care.

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of patients with a cochlear implant (CI) is usually an elective, complex and interdisciplinary process. As an important source of information, patients often access the internet prior to treatment. The quality of internet-based information regarding thematic coverage has not yet been analysed in detail. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyse the information on CI care available on the internet regarding its thematic coverage and readability. MATERIAL METHODS: Eight search phrases related to CI care were defined as part of the study. A checklist for completeness of thematic coverage was then created for each search phrase. The current German CI clinical practice guideline and the white paper on CI care in Germany were used as a basis. As a further parameter, readability was assessed using Flesch Reading Ease Scores. The search phrases were used for an internet search with Google. The first ten results were then analysed with regard to thematic coverage, readability and the provider of the website. RESULTS: A total of 80 websites were identified, which were set up by 54 different providers (16 providers were found in multiple entries) from eight different provider groups. The average completeness of thematic coverage was 41.6 ± 28.2%. Readability according to the Flesch Reading Ease Score was categorised as "hard to read" on average (34.7 ± 14.2 points, range: 0-72). There was a negative statistically significant correlation between the thematic coverage of content and readability (Spearman's rank correlation: r = - 0.413, p = 0.00014). The completeness of thematic coverage of information on CI care available on the internet was highly heterogeneous and had a significant negative correlation with the readability. This result should be taken into account by both the providers of internet information and by patients when using internet-based information on CI care and help to further improve the quality of web-based information.

Outcome Prediction of Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise for Cochlear Implant Candidates Based on Pre-Operative Measures.

(1) Background: The fitting of cochlear implants (CI) is an established treatment, even in cases with considerable residual hearing but insufficient speech perception. The aim of this study was to evaluate a prediction model for speech in quiet and to provide reference data and a predictive model for postoperative speech perception in noise (SPiN) after CI provision. (2) Methods: CI candidates with substantial residual hearing (either in hearing threshold or in word recognition scores) were included in a retrospective analysis (n = 87). Speech perception scores in quiet 12 months post-surgery were compared with the predicted scores. A generalized linear model was fitted to speech reception thresholds (SRTs) after CI fitting to identify predictive variables for SPiN. (3) Results: About two-thirds of the recipients achieved the expected outcome in quiet or were better than expected. The mean absolute error of the prediction was 13.5 percentage points. Age at implantation was the only predictive factor for SPiN showing a significant correlation (r = 0.354; p = 0.007). (4) Conclusions: Outcome prediction accuracy for speech in quiet was comparable to previous studies. For CI recipients in the included study population, the SPiN outcome could be predicted only based on the factor age.

Comparison of hearing performance in patients with borderline indication for active middle ear or cochlear implants: clinical outcomes to guide preoperative counseling and decision making.

PURPOSE: The aim of the presented study was to compare the audiological benefit achieved in cochlear implant (CI) patients who, in principle, could still have been treated with an active middle ear implant (AMEI) with a group of AMEI users. METHODS: Results of 20 CI patients with a pure-tone average (PTA) of 70 dB HL prior to surgery were compared with a group of 12 subjects treated with a Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB). Pre-surgical comparison included PTA for air conduction and bone conduction, maximum speech recognition score for monosyllabic words (WRSmax), and aided monosyllabic word recognition at 65 dB SPL. One year after surgery, aided monosyllabic speech recognition score at 65 dB SPL was compared. RESULTS: Mean PTA for air conduction in the VSB group was significantly lower than in the CI group (4.8 dB, Z = - 2.011, p < 0.05). Mean PTA for bone conduction in the VSB group was also significantly lower than in the CI group (23.4 dB, Z = - 4.673, p < 0.001). WRSmax in the VSB group was significantly better than in the CI group (40.7%, Z = - 3.705, p < 0.001). One year after treatment, there was no significant difference in aided speech perception in quiet between both subject groups. CONCLUSION: Comparison of the two methods showed equivalent results for both treatments in subjects with a borderline indication. Not only pure-tone audiometry results but, particularly, speech perception scores pre-surgery should be taken into account in preoperative counseling.

Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users.

BACKGROUND: Although good speech perception in quiet is achievable with cochlear implants (CIs), speech perception in noise is severely impaired compared to normal hearing (NH). In the case of a bimodal CI fitting with a hearing aid (HA) in the opposite ear, the amount of residual acoustic hearing influences speech perception in noise. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to investigate speech perception in noise in a group of bimodal CI users and compare the results to age-matched HA users and people without subjective hearing loss, as well as with a young NH group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants comprised 19 bimodal CI users, 39 HA users, and 40 subjectively NH subjects in the age group 60-90 years and 14 young NH subjects. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in noise were adaptively measured using the Oldenburg Sentence Test for the two spatial test conditions S0N0 (speech and noise from the front) and multisource-noise field (MSNF; speech from the front, four spatially distributed noise sources) in continuous noise of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Ol-noise) and amplitude-modulated Fastl noise (Fastl-noise). RESULTS: With increasing hearing loss, the median SRT worsened significantly in all conditions. In test condition S0N0, the SRT of the CI group was 5.6 dB worse in Ol-noise than in the young NH group (mean age 26.4 years) and 22.5 dB worse in Fastl-noise; in MSNF, the differences were 6.6 dB (Ol-noise) and 17.3 dB (Fastl-noise), respectively. In the young NH group, median SRT in condition S0N0 improved by 11 dB due to gap listening; in the older NH group, SRTs improved by only 3.1 dB. In the HA and bimodal CI groups there was no gap listening effect and SRTs in Fastl-noise were even worse than in Ol-noise. CONCLUSION: With increasing hearing loss, speech perception in modulated noise is even more impaired than in continuous noise.

[Speech perception in modulated noise assessed in bimodal CI users-German version]. / Sprachverstehen im modulierten Störgeräusch bei bimodal versorgten CI-Tragenden.

BACKGROUND: Although good speech perception in quiet is achievable with cochlear implants (CIs), speech perception in noise is severely impaired compared to normal hearing (NH). In the case of a bimodal CI fitting with a hearing aid (HA) in the opposite ear, the amount of residual acoustic hearing influences speech perception in noise. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to investigate speech perception in noise in a group of bimodal CI users and compare the results to age-matched HA users and people without subjective hearing loss, as well as with a young NH group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Study participants comprised 19 bimodal CI users, 39 HA users, and 40 subjectively NH subjects in the age group 60-90 years and 14 young NH subjects. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) in noise were adaptively measured using the Oldenburg Sentence Test for the two spatial test conditions S0N0 (speech and noise from the front) and multisource-noise field (MSNF; speech from the front, four spatially distributed noise sources) in continuous noise of the Oldenburg Sentence Test (Ol-noise) and amplitude-modulated Fastl noise (Fastl-noise). RESULTS: With increasing hearing loss, the median SRT worsened significantly in all conditions. In test condition S0N0, the SRT of the CI group was 5.6 dB worse in Ol-noise than in the young NH group (mean age 26.4 years) and 22.5 dB worse in Fastl-noise; in MSNF, the differences were 6.6 dB (Ol-noise) and 17.3 dB (Fastl-noise), respectively. In the young NH group, median SRT in condition S0N0 improved by 11 dB due to gap listening; in the older NH group, SRTs improved by only 3.1 dB. In the HA and bimodal CI groups there was no gap listening effect and SRTs in Fastl-noise were even worse than in Ol-noise. CONCLUSION: With increasing hearing loss, speech perception in modulated noise is even more impaired than in continuous noise.

Impact of processing-latency induced interaural delay and level discrepancy on sensitivity to interaural level differences in cochlear implant users.

PURPOSE: This study investigated whether an interaural delay, e.g. caused by the processing latency of a hearing device, can affect sensitivity to interaural level differences (ILDs) in normal hearing subjects or cochlear implant (CI) users with contralateral normal hearing (SSD-CI). METHODS: Sensitivity to ILD was measured in 10 SSD-CI subjects and in 24 normal hearing subjects. The stimulus was a noise burst presented via headphones and via a direct cable connection (CI). ILD sensitivity was measured for different interaural delays in the range induced by hearing devices. ILD sensitivity was correlated with results obtained in a sound localization task using seven loudspeakers in the frontal horizontal plane. RESULTS: In the normal hearing subjects the sensitivity to interaural level differences deteriorated significantly with increasing interaural delays. In the CI group, no significant effect of interaural delays on ILD sensitivity was found. The NH subjects were significantly more sensitive to ILDs. The mean localization error in the CI group was 10.8° higher than in the normal hearing group. No correlation between sound localization ability and ILD sensitivity was found. CONCLUSION: Interaural delays influence the perception of ILDs. For normal hearing subjects a significant decrement in sensitivity to ILD was measured. The effect could not be confirmed in the tested SSD-CI group, probably due to a small subject group with large variations. The temporal matching of the two sides may be beneficial for ILD processing and thus sound localization for CI patients. However, further studies are needed for verification.

Exponential fitting of spread of excitation response measurements in cochlear implants.

BACKGROUND: Hearing performance in cochlear implant (CI) users is variable. An objective measure which can allow a prediction of this performance is desirable. Spread of neural excitation (SoE) curves are an objective measure that can be obtained using the fitting software of cochlear implants and might be able to be used as a predictor. A novel method to interpret SoE curves is presented. NEW METHOD: Spread of excitation measurements for three recording sites were fitted using two exponential functions. An asymmetric width measure was developed, defined as the distance in mm to the point, where 25% or 50% of peak normalized amplitude was reached, for each half of the SoE separately. Also, a novel population of subjects with MED-EL CIs is used. Furthermore, speech perception (speech reception threshold, SRT) was evaluated using a matrix sentence test in a multi-source noise field. RESULTS: SoE width was narrowest for the basal recording site and widest for the apical recording site. Fitted SoE exponential functions were most asymmetric for the apical recording site. A significant positive correlation between sentence test SRT and SoE width at the apical recording site was found. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The use of an asymmetric width measure correlated strongly and positively with speech perception for apical recording sites, unlike the symmetric width measure used in previous studies. Presumably, longer electrodes allow stimulation of a more apical part of the cochlear. At the apical part of the cochlea, dendrites from a large region of the basilar membrane map to a narrow portion on the spiral ganglion, which might explain the observed asymmetry. CONCLUSIONS: For subjects implanted with long electrode arrays, an asymmetric width measure correlates positively with apical SoE distance. However, due to lack of a sufficient amount of data, the results are currently less conclusive and need to be consolidated in a larger cohort of subjects.

Age Differences in Speech Perception in Noise and Sound Localization in Individuals With Subjective Normal Hearing.

Hearing loss in old age, which often goes untreated, has far-reaching consequences. Furthermore, reduction of cognitive abilities and dementia can also occur, which also affects quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the hearing performance of seniors without hearing complaints with respect to speech perception in noise and the ability to localize sounds. Results were tested for correlations with age and cognitive performance. The study included 40 subjects aged between 60 and 90 years (mean age: 69.3 years) with not self-reported hearing problems. The subjects were screened for dementia. Audiological tests included pure-tone audiometry and speech perception in two types of background noise (continuous and amplitude-modulated noise) which was either co-located or spatially separated (multi-source noise field, MSNF) from the target speech. Sound localization ability was assessed and hearing performance was self-evaluated by a questionnaire. Speech in noise and sound localization was compared with young normal hearing adults. Although considering themselves as hearing normal, 17 subjects had at least a mild hearing loss. There was a significant negative correlation between hearing loss and dementia screening (DemTect) score. Speech perception in noise decreased significantly with age. There were significant negative correlations between speech perception in noise and DemTect score for both spatial configurations. Mean SRTs obtained in the co-located noise condition with amplitude-modulated noise were on average 3.1 dB better than with continuous noise. This gap-listening effect was severely diminished compared to a younger normal hearing subject group. In continuous noise, spatial separation of speech and noise led to better SRTs compared to the co-located masker condition. SRTs in MSNF deteriorated in modulated noise compared to continuous noise by 2.6 dB. Highest impact of age was found for speech perception scores using noise stimuli with temporal modulation in binaural test conditions. Mean localization error was in the range of young adults. Mean amount of front/back confusions was 11.5% higher than for young adults. Speech perception tests in the presence of temporally modulated noise can serve as a screening method for early detection of hearing disorders in older adults. This allows for early prescription of hearing aids.

Impact of Reverberation on Speech Perception and Sound Localization Accuracy in Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the impact of reverberation on sound localization accuracy and speech perception in noise between subjects with single-sided deafness using a cochlear implant (SSD-CI) and a normal-hearing control group. METHODS: Nine SSD-CI subjects and 21 normal-hearing subjects participated in the study. In Experiment 1, the sound localization accuracy was measured with and without reverberation. In Experiment 2, speech reception thresholds were determined with four asymmetrically arranged noise sources in free-field and in reverberation. For the realization of reverberation, a room simulation system comprising of 128 loudspeakers was used. RESULTS: No significant impact of reverberation was found on the sound localization accuracy of the SSD-CI subjects (free-field: 12.6°, reverberation: 11.9°), whereas the normal-hearing subjects performed significantly worse in reverberation (free-field: 1.8°, reverberation: 3.3°).Both subject groups experienced significantly deteriorated speech reception thresholds due to reverberation (pSSD-CI = 0.008, pNH < 0.001). Mean speech reception thresholds in the SSD-CI subjects were -9.7 dB SNR (free-field) and -4.2 dB SNR (reverberation) and a median individual decrease of 5.7 dB SNR in reverberation. Mean speech reception thresholds in the normal-hearing group were -14.0 dB SNR (free-field) and -10.3 dB SNR (reverberation). CONCLUSION: A strong deterioration of sound localization accuracy due to reverberation did not occur. However, although partial restoration of binaural hearing is assumed in SSD-CI users, the impact of reverberation on speech perception in noise is much stronger compared to normal-hearing.

Powered air-purifying respirators used during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic significantly reduce speech perception.

BACKGROUND: Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, interventions in the upper airways are considered high-risk procedures for otolaryngologists and their colleagues. The purpose of this study was to evaluate limitations in hearing and communication when using a powered air-purifying respirator (PAPR) system to protect against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission and to assess the benefit of a headset. METHODS: Acoustic properties of the PAPR system were measured using a head and torso simulator. Audiological tests (tone audiometry, Freiburg speech test, Oldenburg sentence test (OLSA)) were performed in normal-hearing subjects (n = 10) to assess hearing with PAPR. The audiological test setup also included simulation of conditions in which the target speaker used either a PAPR, a filtering face piece (FFP) 3 respirator, or a surgical face mask. RESULTS: Audiological measurements revealed that sound insulation by the PAPR headtop and noise, generated by the blower-assisted respiratory protection system, resulted in significantly deteriorated hearing thresholds (4.0 ± 7.2 dB hearing level (HL) vs. 49.2 ± 11.0 dB HL, p < 0.001) and speech recognition scores in quiet (100.0 ± 0.0% vs. 2.5 ± 4.2%, p < 0.001; OLSA: 20.8 ± 1.8 dB vs. 61.0 ± 3.3 dB SPL, p < 0.001) when compared to hearing without PAPR. Hearing with PAPR was significantly improved when the subjects were equipped with an in-ear headset (p < 0.001). Sound attenuation by FFP3 respirators and surgical face masks had no clinically relevant impact on speech perception. CONCLUSIONS: The PAPR system evaluated here can be considered for high-risk procedures in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients, provided that hearing and communication of the surgical team are optimized by the additional use of a headset.

Interleaved Acoustic Environments: Impact of an Auditory Scene Classification Procedure on Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Clinical speech perception tests with simple presentation conditions often overestimate the impact of signal preprocessing on speech perception in complex listening environments. A new procedure was developed to assess speech perception in interleaved acoustic environments of different complexity that allows investigation of the impact of an automatic scene classification (ASC) algorithm on speech perception. The procedure was applied in cohorts of normal hearing (NH) controls and uni- and bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured by means of a matrix sentence test in five acoustic environments that included different noise conditions (amplitude modulated and continuous), two spatial configurations, and reverberation. The acoustic environments were encapsulated in a randomized, mixed order single experimental run. Acoustic room simulation was played back with a loudspeaker auralization setup with 128 loudspeakers. 18 NH, 16 unilateral, and 16 bilateral CI users participated. SRTs were evaluated for each individual acoustic environment and as mean-SRT. Mean-SRTs improved by 2.4 dB signal-to-noise ratio for unilateral and 1.3 dB signal-to-noise ratio for bilateral CI users with activated ASC. Without ASC, the mean-SRT of bilateral CI users was 3.7 dB better than the SRT of unilateral CI users. The mean-SRT indicated significant differences, with NH group performing best and unilateral CI users performing worse with a difference of up to 13 dB compared to NH. The proposed speech test procedure successfully demonstrated that speech perception and benefit with ASC depend on the acoustic environment.

Band-Limited Chirp-Evoked Compound Action Potential in Guinea Pig: Comprehensive Neural Measure for Cochlear Implantation Monitoring.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with severely impaired high-frequency hearing and sufficient residual low-frequency hearing can be provided with a cochlear implant (CI), thereby facilitating ipsilateral electric and acoustic stimulation with established advantages over electric stimulation alone. However, partial or complete hearing loss often occurred after implantation due to, inter alia, acute mechanical trauma to cochlear structures during electrode insertion. Possibilities of intraoperative monitoring using electrocochleography (ECochG) have recently been studied in CI patients, primarily using the ongoing response to low-frequency tone bursts consisting of the cochlear microphonic (CM) and the auditory nerve neurophonic. By contrast, the transient neural response to tone bursts, that is, compound action potential (CAP), was generally less detectable or less sensitive as a monitoring measure, thus falling short of providing useful contribution to electrocochleography analysis. In this study, we investigate using chirps to evoke more robust CAP responses in a limited frequency band by synchronizing neural firing, and thereby improving CAP sensitivity to mechanical trauma in a guinea pig model of cochlear implantation. DESIGN: Stimuli were band-limited between 100 Hz and 10 kHz to investigate their frequency range selectivity as a preliminary model for low-frequency hearing. They were constructed by adding a harmonic series either with zero phase delay (click) or by adjusting the phase delay at a rate that is inversely related to a traveling wave delay model (chirp), with three different parameters to examine level-dependent delay compression. The amplitude spectrum was thus identical between stimuli with differences only in phase. In Experiment 1, we compared input-output functions recorded at the round window in normal-hearing guinea pigs and implemented a high-pass noise masking paradigm to infer neural contribution to the CAP. In Experiment 2, guinea pigs were implanted with a custom-built CI electrode using a motorized micromanipulator. Acute mechanical trauma was simulated during the electrode insertion. At each insertion step, CAP and CM responses were measured at the round window for the following stimuli: broad-band click, band-limited click, and band-limited chirps (3 parameters), and tone bursts at frequencies 1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz. RESULTS: Chirps compared with the equal-band click showed significantly lower thresholds and steeper slopes of sigmoid-fitted input-output functions. The shorter chirp evoked significantly larger amplitudes than click when compared at equal sensation level. However, the click evoked larger amplitudes than chirps at higher levels and correspondingly achieved larger saturation amplitudes. The results of the high-pass noise masking paradigm suggest that chirps could efficiently synchronize neural firing in their targeted frequency band, while the click recruited more basal fibers outside its limited band. Finally, monitoring sensitivity during electrode insertion, defined as relative amplitude change per unit distance, was higher for chirp-evoked CAP and tone burst-evoked CM, but smaller for CAP responses evoked by clicks or tone bursts. CONCLUSION: The chirp was shown to be an efficient stimulus in synchronizing neural firing for a limited frequency band in the guinea pig model. This study provides a proof of principle for using chirp-evoked CAP as a comprehensive neural measure in CI patients with residual hearing.

Sensitivity to interaural time differences and localization accuracy in cochlear implant users with combined electric-acoustic stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, localization accuracy and sensitivity to acoustic interaural time differences (ITDs) in subjects using cochlear implants with combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) were assessed and compared with the results of a normal hearing control group. METHODS: Eight CI users with EAS (2 bilaterally implanted, 6 unilaterally implanted) and symmetric binaural acoustic hearing and 24 normal hearing subjects participated in the study. The first experiment determined mean localization error (MLE) for different angles of sound incidence between ± 60° (frontal and dorsal presentation). The stimuli were either low-pass, high-pass or broadband noise bursts. In a second experiment, just noticeable differences (JND) of ITDs were measured for pure tones of 125 Hz, 250 Hz and 500 Hz (headphone presentation). RESULTS: Experiment 1: MLE of EAS subjects was 8.5°, 14.3° and 14.7°, (low-, high-pass and broadband stimuli respectively). In the control group, MLE was 1.8° (broadband stimuli). In the differentiation between sound incidence from front and back, EAS subjects performed on chance level. Experiment 2: The JND-ITDs were 88.7 µs for 125 Hz, 48.8 µs for 250 Hz and 52.9 µs for 500 Hz (EAS subjects). Compared to the control group, JND-ITD for 125 Hz was on the same level of performance. No statistically significant correlation was found between MLE and JND-ITD in the EAS cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Near to normal ITD sensitivity in the lower frequency acoustic hearing was demonstrated in a cohort of EAS users. However, in an acoustic localization task, the majority of the subjects did not reached the level of accuracy of normal hearing. Presumably, signal processing time delay differences between devices used on both sides are deteriorating the transfer of precise binaural timing cues.

Device profile of the MED-EL cochlear implant system for hearing loss: overview of its safety and efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Patients suffering from severe to profound hearing loss or even deafness can achieve a hearing improvement with a cochlear implant (CI) treatment that is significantly higher than the results achieved with conventional hearing aids. The CI system consists of an implantable stimulator, which is inserted retro-auricularly into the mastoid, and an externally worn processor unit, which provides the pickup of sound and processing of acoustic information as well as the power supply for the stimulator and internal current sources. The stimulator has an electrode array that is inserted into the cochlea. AREAS COVERED: This is a descriptive overview of MED-EL's multichannel CI system (MED-EL, Innsbruck, Austria), which was introduced to the European market in 1994. The continuing development of the implant as well as the external components is outlined and various other aspects (stimulation strategy, adaptation, results, reliability) are discussed. EXPERT COMMENTARY: The strength of the company is the continuous pursuit of innovative ideas. This is evidenced by numerous innovations. The reliability of the implants has been continuously improved. The current SYNCHRONY models of the manufacturer show no indication of technically caused failures over an observation period of 5 years.

Pitch Matching in Cochlear Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness: Effects of Electrode Position and Acoustic Stimulus Type.

Previous studies in patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) have reported results of pitch comparisons between electric stimulation of their cochlear implant (CI) and acoustic stimulation presented to their near-normal hearing contralateral ear. These comparisons typically used sinusoids, although the percept elicited by electric stimulation may be closer to a wideband stimulus. Furthermore, it has been shown that pitch comparisons between sounds with different timbres is a difficult task and subjected to various types of range biases. The present study aims to introduce a method to minimize non-sensory biases, and to investigate the effect of different acoustic stimulus types on the frequency and variability of the electric-acoustic pitch matches. Pitch matches were collected from 13 CI users with SSD using the binary search procedure. Electric stimulation was presented at either an apical or a middle electrode position, at a rate of 800 pps. Acoustic stimulus types were sinusoids (SINE), 1/3-octave wide narrow bands of Gaussian noises (NBN), or 1/3-octave wide pulse spreading harmonic complexes (PSHC). On the one hand, NBN and PSHC are presumed to better mimic the spread of excitation produced by a single-electrode stimulation than SINE. On the other hand, SINE and PSHC contain less inherent fluctuations than NBN and may therefore provide a temporal pattern closer to that produced by a constant-amplitude electric pulse train. Analysis of mean pitch match variance showed no differences between stimulus types. However, mean pitch matches showed effects of electrode position and stimulus type, with the middle electrode always matched to a higher frequency than the apical one (p < 0.001), and significantly higher across-subject pitch matches for PSHC compared with SINE (p = 0.017). Mean pitch matches for all stimulus types were better predicted by place-dependent characteristic frequencies (CFs) based on an organ of Corti map compared with a spiral ganglion map. CF predictions were closest to pitch matches with SINE for the apical electrode position, and conversely with NBN or PSHC for the middle electrode position. These results provide evidence that the choice of acoustic stimulus type can have a significant effect on electric-acoustic pitch matching.

[Speech perception and cognitive abilities in seniors without subjective hearing loss]. / Sprachverstehen und kognitive Leistungen bei Senioren ohne subjektive Hörminderung.

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of elderly test subjects without self-reported hearing loss to perceive, hear and comprehend speech in quiet and noise. Furthermore, the effects of age and cognitive performance on hearing were also investigated.The study included 40 subjects aged over 60 years (average age: 69.3 ±â€…7.1 years). The subjects were screened for dementia (DemTect test) to test for any signs of cognitive deficiencies. Average hearing loss (PTA_4) and average high-frequency hearing loss (PTA_HT) were determined. Speech perception in quiet was tested by means of the Freiburg monosyllabic speech test and in noise by means of the Oldenburg sentence test with two different types of noise (temporally continuous and amplitude modulated). While the results of the DemTect test were age-appropriate for 65 % of the subjects, the remaining 35 % showed signs of mild cognitive impairments. The parameters of cognitive performance decreased significantly with age. The hearing loss (PTA_4 and PTA_HT) of the subjects correlated significantly with both age and DemTect score. Speech perception in both quiet and noise decreased significantly with age as well as within the parameters to assess cognitive performance.Seniors should undergo routine hearing screenings in order to detect hearing disorders as soon as possible so that hearing aids can be prescribed at an early stage. This would also allow, patients to get accustomed to their hearing aids early on and to achieve better hearing, thereby improving their quality of life.

Speech perception in noise: Impact of directional microphones in users of combined electric-acoustic stimulation.

OBJECTIVES: Combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) is a well-accepted therapeutic treatment for cochlear implant (CI) users with residual hearing in the low frequencies but severe to profound hearing loss in the high frequencies. The recently introduced SONNETeas audio processor offers different microphone directionality (MD) settings and wind noise reduction (WNR) as front-end processing. The aim of this study was to compare speech perception in quiet and noise between two EAS audio processors DUET 2 and SONNETeas, to assess the impact of MD and WNR on speech perception in EAS users in the absence of wind. Furthermore, subjective rating of hearing performance was registered. METHOD: Speech perception and subjective rating with SONNETeas or DUET 2 audio processor were assessed in 10 experienced EAS users. Speech perception was measured in quiet and in a diffuse noise setup (MSNF). The SONNETeas processor was tested with three MD settings omnidirectional/natural/adaptive and with different intensities of WNR. Subjective rating of auditory benefit and sound quality was rated using two questionnaires. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between DUET 2 and SONNETeas processor using the omnidirectional microphone in quiet and in noise. There was a significant improvement in SRT with MD settings natural (2.2 dB) and adaptive (3.6 dB). No detrimental effect of the WNR algorithm on speech perception was found in the absence of wind. Sound quality was rated as "moderate" for both audio processors. CONCLUSIONS: The different MD settings of the SONNETeas can provide EAS users with better speech perception compared to an omnidirectional microphone. Concerning speech perception in quiet and quality of life, the performance of the DUET 2 and SONNETeas audio processors was comparable.

Impact of Microphone Configuration on Speech Perception of Cochlear Implant Users in Traffic Noise.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of microphone configuration and noise reduction algorithm on speech perception of cochlear implant (CI) users in a moving noise setup. METHOD: Eleven CI users provided with Advanced Bionics implant systems participated in this study. All tests were conducted with three different microphone settings: (a) omnidirectional behind the ear (BTE), (b) inside the pinna (ITP), and (c) adaptive directional microphone (adaptive beamformer, ABF). Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured using the Oldenburg sentence test in a moving noise source condition. Furthermore, the effect of a noise reduction algorithm on speech perception was measured in a condition with an additional static noise source. RESULTS: The ABF setting significantly improved SRT by 5.7 dB compared with the BTE microphone, and by 4.7 dB compared with the ITP microphone in the moving noise condition. In the presence of an additional static noise source, there was a significant improvement in SRT of 0.9 dB with the use of NR in addition to ABF. CONCLUSION: Adaptive beamforming can significantly improve speech perception in moving noise. Depending on the noise condition, the combination of ABF with NR can provide additional benefit.

[Investigation of the quality of hearing aid provision in seniors considering cognitive functions]. / Untersuchung der Qualität der Hörgeräteversorgung bei Senioren unter Berücksichtigung kognitiver Einflussfaktoren.

In the group of people over the age of 65, hearing loss is one of the most common health problems. To maintain communication skills in this population, adequate hearing aid fitting is essential. The aim of the present study is to review the quality of hearing aid provision in the elderly. Furthermore, the influence of age and cognitive performance on speech perception should be considered. Forty subjects between the ages of 66 and 88 years were examined with unilateral or bilateral hearing aids. Average hearing loss (frequencies 0.5-1-2-4 kHz), averaged high-frequency hearing loss (frequencies 2-4-6 kHz), maximum monosyllable recognition score (German: maximales Einsilberverstehen, mEV) and aided speech intelligibility at 65 dB HL speech level were considered. To determine the potential cognitive impact on speech perception, a screening for dementia (DemTect test) and a working memory test were used. Although hearing aids showed benefit in 82% of the reviewed cases, an improvement of at least 20% compared with the unaided condition as required by the German "Hilfsmittelrichtlinie" was not achieved in 56% of the cases. Individual mEV with a maximum standard deviation of 10 % was not achieved in 81 % of the cases.Correlations between working memory performance or DemTect-test score and mEV were not of significance. Mild cognitive impairment and degraded working memory or age did not affect speech perception with hearing aids in our study cohort.

Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed outcomes of hearing preservation (HP) surgery depending on the angle of insertion (AOI) in a cochlear implant (CI) patient population who used electric stimulation (ES) or combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case review. SETTING: Tertiary referral university hospital. PATIENTS: Ninety-one patients with different degrees of preoperative low-frequency residual hearing who underwent HP surgery with a free-fitting lateral-wall electrode array (MED-EL Flex) with lengths ranging from 20.0 to 31.5 mm. INTERVENTION: Cochlear implantation using HP surgery technique and subsequent fitting with CI speech processor for ES, or combined CI and hearing aid speech processor for EAS. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Individual AOI were estimated using modified Stenvers' projection. Freiburg monosyllable test in quiet (free-field presentation at 65 dB SPL) and pure-tone averages for low frequencies (125, 250, and 500 Hz; PTAlow) were evaluated during a follow-up period of 12 months after implantation. RESULTS: Estimated AOIs showed bimodal distribution: shallow insertion (SI) with mean AOI of 377 degrees and deep insertion (DI) with mean AOI of 608 degrees. Speech test scores after 12 months were comparable between AOI groups, however, they were significantly different between stimulation types with better scores for EAS. Only ES showed a positive correlation (r = 0.293) between speech test score and AOI. When HP was possible, both SI and DI showed significant postoperative PTAlow shifts with mean of 17.8 and 21.6 dB, respectively. These were comparable between AOI groups and no significant shifts were observed in follow-up intervals. Audiometric indication for HP and subsequent EAS is proposed up to 65 dB HL at 500 Hz, and up to 87 dB HL for HP. CONCLUSIONS: CI candidates can benefit from HP surgery with deep insertion when only using ES due to insufficient residual hearing. Conversely, candidates with preoperative threshold up to 65 dB HL at 500 Hz could perform significantly better with EAS which requires shallow insertion.